No edit summary |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I think option two LOOKS better, but, yeah, it doesn't matter that much. [[User:Serpente|Serpente]] 09:01, August 10, 2010 (UTC) |
I think option two LOOKS better, but, yeah, it doesn't matter that much. [[User:Serpente|Serpente]] 09:01, August 10, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Opton, 1, please. [[User:Boozha|Boozha]] 09:14, August 10, 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:14, 10 August 2010
There's a lot of suggestions and questions about methods of making pages, so if there's anything of general interest, post it here.( I'd suggest making a section 2 heading for each new topic.) If you are less interested in this or prefer a different method, talk about that too.
Ranks or types of an ability
First, how do ranks or types of an ability want to be handled? I am personally lazy when I am typing quickly and piped links mean more typing. What I was currently doing is typing part of the name (examples are in Sand Elemental and below). However, I think having half the ability one color and half another color doesn't look quite as nice, so I thought I would ask.
For example, Stat Bonus - Damage 1 would look like Stat Bonus - Damage 1, with the intent to organize information on the Stat Bonus page. One possible option looks like Stat Bonus - Damage 1 with code ([[Stat Bonus]] - Damage 1). That takes less typing than Stat Bonus - Damage 1 with code [[Stat Bonus|Stat Bonus - Damage 1]], though the total link looks a bit better to me.
I've been manually hotlinking the stat bonus thing, but I've been feeding them all into Stat Bonus (which hasn't been made yet). I think it would make sense for convenience sake to do the former - the only important bit is that they all link into the same place and show the necessary information. Away-Away 05:43, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
I think option two LOOKS better, but, yeah, it doesn't matter that much. Serpente 09:01, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Opton, 1, please. Boozha 09:14, August 10, 2010 (UTC)